6 comments

  • bryanlarsen 10 minutes ago
    Seems odd that the Big 6 banks are not included. Without them, this plan is doomed to stay fringe. I assume there is a plan to include them somehow?
    • everfree 8 minutes ago
      Included soon, from the article:

      > With additional participants onboarding continually in the coming months, including all major Canadian financial institutions and other members applying for access, the RTR will be available to more than nine in 10 Canadians within the first year after launch.

  • ChrisArchitect 2 minutes ago
    Not so hot on the name, initially thought it was some kind of train system payment thing. But that just lends to the coverage of this out in random mainstream media confusing consumers - not really a consumer thing but an infrastructure thing on the backend for banks/institutions. On the consumer side many will immediately think of Interac eTransfers, which this has little to do with as far as consumer experience, but it will also use this on the backend for things. Carry on.
  • petcat 15 minutes ago
    Will be curious to see if this ends up requiring Google/Apple accounts and mobile device attestation in order to work.
    • muizelaar 12 minutes ago
      Real-time Rail is for financial institutions to settle transactions not for direct consumer use.
      • wolttam 9 minutes ago
        > This new national payment system will transform day-to-day payments for Canadian businesses and consumers by enabling instant speed and settlement.

        It does sound like it's for consumers as well

  • ChrisArchitect 34 minutes ago
    • ocd 22 minutes ago
      Updated.
  • julianlam 20 minutes ago
    Interac (eTransfer/EMT) is a great system that has already rolled out nation-wide.

    Unfortunately its utility is curtailed severely if your bank doesn't trust your mobile OS (LineageOS, for me). For security purposes, my bank (RBC) triggers identity checks every time I try to send an EMT, and even after sending selfies, drivers licences, etc. — it still rejects the transfer.

    So, security at the cost of all utility.

    I have now resorted to transferring money between my accounts using paper cheques... like it's the 90s. If somehow they deny me cheque deposits I'll have to use an ATM and walk the money to the other bank. Given how there are now banks that don't even have branches, this could be a major problem in the future.

    This Real-Time Rail system sounds promising, but that's not the link that'll kill it for everyone.

    • T-RN-R 5 minutes ago
      99.999% of people don’t root and install custom operating systems on consumer hardware. The bank derives immense security value by enforcing this, at the expense of your hobby installation.
    • dcrazy 14 minutes ago
      The utility is preventing malware bundled with pirated apps from transferring away your personal savings in a hard-to-reverse instant transfer.

      You, as a technically savvy user, could choose to use a dedicated device with an acceptable security posture for your electronic transfers.

    • kevin_nisbet 7 minutes ago
      Unless I'm missing something I'd expect Payments Canada to have similar issues for you, since it'll still be the banks that you interact with. What changes is the settlement and messaging system between the banks.
    • gpm 8 minutes ago
      Weird... I've never had problems using eTransfer from a browser (firefox) on my computer (linux)... which has got to be as untrustworthy a device as there is.
    • fl4regun 2 minutes ago
      can't you just use the web interface?
  • tamimio 24 minutes ago
    The article didn’t mention how is this different from current interac, and great to see wealthsimple is already in it!
    • toomuchtodo 19 minutes ago
      Canada's Interac is anagolous to US' Zelle payment network (which is owned by the largest US commercial banks), while RTR is the US FedNow equivalent ("true" instant payment and settlement with broader use case support, operated as a utility by the US Federal Reserve).

      https://www.redcompasslabs.com/insights/why-canada-needs-ano... was something I found via a search that explains some of the nuance without writing a new post on the topic, other citations and resources are welcome.

      (it should be expected that newer, utility ran instant payment systems cannibalize existing, more expensive, lower legacy payment rails; going fast and being cheap as a utility is the innovation)

      • smnrchrds 12 minutes ago
        Has FedNow had any visible effect in the US? Are bill payments and bank to bank transfers now happening instantaneously?
        • toomuchtodo 11 minutes ago
          ~$800B/year in annual volume run rate, as of this comment. You can move up to $10M per value message for less than 5 cents, with a max 20 second time to completion SLA.

          https://www.frbservices.org/resources/financial-services/fed...

          (i am contributing subject matter expertise to policymakers to make offering FedNow rails to financial services customers a requirement of having a banking license, so I'm a bit biased; this is the only way we'll get off of closed payment rails like Zelle, slow open rails like ACH, or expensive faster legacy credit card rails)

          > Are bill payments and bank to bank transfers now happening instantaneously?

          Walmart is currently rolling it out. I expect others to start to as you see them surcharge credit card payments (US mobile phone providers, internet providers, etc). It's trivial to build into an app experience, with or without a partner like Plaid (for example).

          > “It surprised me,” Henry said of adoption of Walmart’s first iteration of pay-by-bank, which is available online but hasn’t been marketed to customers. “It’s certainly surpassed our expectations of the amount of customers that have registered and actually use the payment type.”

          > Walmart’s upgraded pay-by-bank offering will be rolled out in 2025. The transactions will occur over bank technology provider Fiserv’s NOW Network, which integrates with The Clearing House’s Real Time Payments network and the Federal Reserve’s FedNow. Until now, large retailers hesitated to launch real time payment options because many banks were not connected to an instant settlement system, meaning their customers would not be able to use the product. NOW Network aims to connect to as many banks as possible to reach 100% of deposit accounts by combining its own network with RTP and FedNow.

          Walmart Plans Instant Bank Payments, Cutting Out Card Networks - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41593450 - September 2024 (3 comments)

          https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49632105 (additional citations)

          https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49433164 (additional citations)

          • smnrchrds 6 minutes ago
            Has this lead to any user-visible changes? Like, can you pay your bills on the due date now instead of a couple of business days earlier, not having to worry about it arriving on time?
            • toomuchtodo 5 minutes ago
              The most visible change I've seen is that I can move funds instantly between my credit union and Wise, others would have to chime in for more pireps/ground truth on this which apps are getting this value in front of users.
          • dcrazy 8 minutes ago
            Is ~800B a lot? It doesn’t sound like a lot in the context of the U.S. economy.
            • toomuchtodo 4 minutes ago
              Draw your attention to YoY upward volume trajectory. It is still "warming up." TAM is all existing check, ACH, Zelle, and credit card volume. Takes time for folks to get the warm fuzzies and migrate to new systems.

              https://whatispix.com/ is what target state looks like.

              Brazil's Pix payment system faces pressure from Visa and Mastercard - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48052371 - May 2026 (383 comments)