Children of Men: The Future Is a Mirror for the Present

(reactormag.com)

51 points | by speckx 1 hour ago

12 comments

  • jacquesm 8 minutes ago
    One of the best movies I've ever watched, and one of the few that I could only watch once. It alternates between a gut-wrenching view of a very plausible future and scenes that have you sitting on the edge of your chair. To call it roller coaster would be an understatement.

    If you haven't watched it: don't read the rest of the comments here, go watch the movie, then read the comments.

  • julianpye 37 minutes ago
    I went to the Biennale in Venice last weekend and thought about the movie intensely after visiting the Japanese pavilion. If you don't know about it - the Biennale features artists representing specific countries as they transform a fixed pavilion building into their vision. When you walk across the Giardini site, you walk through themes of the globe. Often these themes are overly political and identity-themed, but the simplicity of the Japanese pavilion this year was refreshing.

    This year the Japanese pavilion was full of 11lb baby dolls, which a user could adopt and walk around with and interact with in changing stations and sleep and play areas. The intro said: "Babies are born anywhere, regardless of wars, terrors, and boycotts." It made me think how they used to be everywhere and now that birth rates have declined significantly they have become rare, expensive and often parents handle them like some luxurious pet, when they should be 'renewables' of ourselves.

    • yboris 14 minutes ago
      YouTube short of the space: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Gww1RtyEwww
    • lotsofpulp 8 minutes ago
      Babies have always been expensive. The expense just happened to not be fully accounted for until recently.

      Although, perhaps it could be better framed as the short term expense was not accounted for, whereas now, the long term expense is not accounted for.

      Short term being less than a few decades and long term being more than a few decades.

      There is also a collective vs individual expense aspect.

      • forgotaccount3 0 minutes ago
        > Babies have always been expensive.

        They have always been expensive, and they have never been as expensive as today.

        More than any other resource, babies require time. Talking purely from a US perspective, inflation adjusted income has never been higher.

        https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/mehoinusa672n

        When we earn more, the time spent to care for a baby 'costs' more because it's time not spent working. It's time not spent continuing your education. It's time not spent doing some expensive bougie luxury like paying someone else to cook you a meal.

        It's a similar reasoning as to why working hours have only dropped a bit. When we earn more per hour, we can afford the same quality of life with fewer hours worked. However it also means each hour we choose not work is costing us more in opportunity cost. So we choose to work more.

        Still, considering how many years we spend in education with little to no employment, and how many years we are currently able to live after we have retired, the % of our lifetime spent working has never been lower.

    • khalic 35 minutes ago
      I keep marveling at art's capacity to elicit deep thoughts and feelings, universally
  • trevithick 28 minutes ago
    This is a great movie. There's more tension in the low-speed car chase scene than any high-speed chase I've ever watched.
    • 4dregress 1 minute ago
      The single shot action sequence in the immigrant camp is my fav scene.
    • sva_ 16 minutes ago
      There is also imho one of the best one-shot scenes ever made

      https://youtu.be/g2vX7IHg_SE

      Sits on the throne with the one in True Detective S01E04

      https://youtu.be/vnRTITzYnXs

      • dekhn 5 minutes ago
        It appears as one take, although I think it's actually several different scenes with a seamless transition.

        To me it's one of the best scenes if not the best scene I've ever seen in a movie: from a small intense escape scene to a full battle, followed by a revelation that brings people to their knees. All shot basically first-person, with extremely complex action and emotion. Absolutely gutting.

    • justindz 23 minutes ago
      Also an incredible long shot. Adolescence did amazing work with the technique recently, too.
  • 4dregress 3 minutes ago
    I’ve been saying this for over a decade.

    The parallels between that film and the UK as it currently is is harrowing.

    I always joked I was going live in a house like Michael Kanes character, only to end up doing it.

    A connected rural hide away, where we can weather the UK’s rapid decay and decline.

    The way the film depicts the treatment of immigrants was what always got me, I would joke (half) just wait till climate change makes southern Europe too hot to live in…

    I hate being right!

    • 15155 2 minutes ago
      > A connected rural hide away, where we can weather the UK’s rapid decay and decline.

      A nice idea, if it weren't for the fact that the tax man can still get to you.

  • flerchin 38 minutes ago
    It's a real gem. I've only seen it once, but I still reference this movie at least a couple of times a year. With world fertility rates seemingly all in decline, it only becomes more relevant.
    • swiftcoder 13 minutes ago
      > With world fertility rates seemingly all in decline

      As much as various folks like to bang on about declining birthrates, the global birthrate is positive (i.e. >2.0 children per woman), and birthrates are only really low in very affluent demographics.

      There's nothing particularly sinister going on either - since most children with access to adequate nutrition and healthcare now survive into adulthood, these societies are not losing a ton of population to wars, very little reason for reproducing above replacement rate.

      • cael450 6 minutes ago
        Yeah, it is very weird to me too. It's only a problem in a handful of countries that have really, really low birthrates and can't/won't attract immigrants.
  • arkensaw 24 minutes ago
    Tangent time:

    I love Children of Men, I think its dark, prescient, moving and a fantastic technical achievement. Easily one of my top five movies.

    I found myself nodding along with everything until I hit these lines:

    > Many excellent movies are chase movies! The Terminator (1984) is a chase movie. Alfred Hitchcock’s North by Northwest (1959) is a chase movie. One of the greatest movies ever made (according to me), George Miller’s Mad Max: Fury Road (2015), is the purest distillation of a chase movie.

    Why do people love Fury Road so much? I watched it in the cinema, and I enjoyed it. I thought it was very colorful, had great stunts, etc. A bit derivative of the second and third movie but whatever. George Miller has a format that seems to work. I was shocked when it was nominated for best picture. Best Picture! Years later I listened to a podcast on the making of it, and got a lot of insight into the struggle behind the scenes, and how difficult it was both on set and in pre-production. I had new found respect for everyone involved. I watched it again with new eyes, and... nope. It's fine. It's got some great set-pieces, but I just don't understand the hyperbole. It is, at best, the 3rd best Mad Max movie

    • righthand 11 minutes ago
      It was the first intro to Mad Max for a lot of people is why.
  • thrownawaysz 28 minutes ago
    Interesting how the article is not mentioning the (inverted) Christian allegory as if that doesn't even exist. It's not even subtle if you actually watch the film, like that's almost the point of it.

    The original book is even more explicit about that, like Theo does a makeshipt baptism on the infant amidst all the fighting.

  • bluegatty 26 minutes ago
    It's a nativity story; faith overcoming nihilism. Explicitly in the book, obliquely (but frankly obviously) in the film.
  • enaaem 16 minutes ago
    Sci-fi has always been the perfect vehicle for social commentary, because it does not instantly trigger anything inside people. It is an impossible story in an impossible world, so relax. If you want to write something about black and white people, you should write a story about purple and green people instead. That's how X-men escapes all the woke allegations.
    • Cthulhu_ 1 minute ago
      I wonder if this is why people don't consider it a sci-fi story, no high tech and no stand-ins for real societal issues (like aliens in District 9)
  • debrisontrack 38 minutes ago
    I'm just at beginning of the article, but I immediately have to disagree with something :) "...this remains one of the absolute best sci fi movies of the 21st century."

    I'd say it's not just one of the best sci fi movies, it's one of the best movies of the 21st century, period. Definitely one of my all time favorites, despite some of its flaws, it wastes no time, has great pace, is a fully contained story and gets its point across very well. And I'm not even talking about how relevant some of its themes are.

    ...anyway, back to reading.

  • scotty79 44 minutes ago
    > One particularly brilliant aspect I keep thinking about is how the movie ends. We don’t know what will become of Kee and her baby. [...] We want to think Kee and her baby will change things, but we don’t know for sure because the future is—quite literally, in the final scene—shrouded in fog.

    When I first saw this movie, I think the last scene was just her with baby and dead protagonist in a boat, in the fog.

    But when I rewatched it more recently, there was also the ship they were trying to reach appearing out of the fog.

    Did this movie have two different ending versions? Or did I just misremeber or watched a damaged copy? What ending have you seen?

  • 48585858 47 minutes ago
    [flagged]