Codex Pricing: Pro has unlimited 5.6 usage

(chatgpt.com)

12 points | by rene_d 1 hour ago

5 comments

  • Tiberium 52 minutes ago
    I don't see that? It's unlimited in chat on the Pro plans, not in Codex.
    • skeledrew 46 minutes ago
      It's there

      > Maximum Codex tasks

      > ...

      > Unlimited GPT-5.6 and file uploads

      • Tiberium 31 minutes ago
        It's not Codex-specific, 5.6 is for chat. Look at another entry, for example:

        "Expanded projects, tasks, and custom GPTs"

        Do you have custom GPTs in Codex?

        This is just the generic ChatGPT plan comparison, but under the Codex url.

        • skeledrew 23 minutes ago
          It does say "Codex is included in your ChatGPT Free, Go, Plus, Pro, Business, or Enterprise plan." at the top of the page. Just scroll to the Pro (last tier) section for that detail.
          • Tiberium 22 minutes ago
            I'm not sure why we are even arguing here, you can go into Codex or ChatGPT Work and start using 5.6. It'll start draining your weekly Codex limit. There's no unlimited 5.6 in Codex.
            • skeledrew 11 minutes ago
              I'm just going by what I see on the linked page. Under the Pro section ($100+) it says unlimited 5.6, and Codex usage is included in all tiers. So I can only conclude that unlimited 5.6 is available in Codex (for $100+/month). If that isn't the case then may want to contact support.
  • rsyring 36 minutes ago
    Notably the business "Pro" plan is missing for $125 / month. So doesn't seem to be benefitting from this and maybe is being discontinued?

    This pricing stuff is so frustrating. I run a small business so Enterprise doesn't fit us. The personal plans are better than the business plans. So we just do reimbursements for the personal plans.

    I would mind paying $125 for SMB plans equivalent to the personal $100 plan, assuming they were as good or better than the personal plan. But I don't understand this pricing model that has the individual plans beating the business plans soundly.

  • skeledrew 41 minutes ago
    Just a couple days after I commented[0]; it's like they read it and heeded. I must admit I'm feeling quite tempted.

    [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49883353

  • tetrisgm 44 minutes ago
    This had the asterisk of “reasonable use”, so unlimited is actually practically bounded. That limit is not stated
    • skeledrew 35 minutes ago
      "You'll know if/when you hit it."
  • verdverm 54 minutes ago
    token vendors on the path to unlimited plans like mobile data, you love to see it
    • georgel 50 minutes ago
      And just like those "unlimited" plans, the disclaimer always reads speeds slow down after N GB transferred/mo. If this unlimited tokens world happens, I expect vendors to start throttling or downgrading models.

      Network neutrality meet token neutrality.

      • skeledrew 36 minutes ago
        In this case I wouldn't mind some throttling. After all this is constantly using particular amount of resources to get particular performance, unlike internet/data where it's essentially the same level of resource usage regardless of performance.
      • verdverm 16 minutes ago
        That's essentially what the OpenCode Go plan is half way to, but with clear quotas

        There is a difference in that different models consume different a.ounts of resources (electricity), so times are not as uniform as bytes of data